Sunday, April 01, 2007

Meet Alfredo

As is typical of many large cities, Maputo has a certain magnetism that attracts homeless people in search of the too-often-empty promise of a better future. Thousands of children, orphaned or abandoned, find that they are not exempt from this cruelty. Laura's friend Sarah, an American missionary living here with her husband and young family, share the following story:

Last night, on our way home from a local art fair, we were confronted by one of the many sobering realities of life here in Maputo. A young street boy approached us and asked for money, so we gave him $0.25 and suggested that he use it to buy himself some bread.

Before long, he had returned and was asking for more money. We noticed that he had bought some chewing gum from a street vendor. A little confused, but thinking perhaps that he was going to sell the gum for a small profit, we asked him why he had bought gum instead of bread.

We continued talking to this young boy. His name is Alfredo, and lives out here on the street. We asked him where his mom and dad were. "They're both dead." He has sisters in Panda, about 7 hours north of Maputo, but no family here. His step-mother had brought him to the city, but had later abandoned him.

This 11-year old boy, smaller than my son Kaleb, was hungry, desperate, dirty, smelly and wearing oversized, ripped clothes that exposed to the world his lack of underwear. After five minutes of listening to Alfredo's story, our kids piped up from the backseat, reminding us of our family verse: Matthew 25:31-46. Kaleb said, “Dad, I just keep hearing in my head, 'Whatever you have done to the least of these brothers of mine you have done it unto me.'”

We decided to do something unconventional. We took this boy home with us and gave him soap and shampoo so that he could take a shower. Kaleb, who is 9, picked out some new clothes for him. He would wear a Twins baseball jersey and shorts, white socks and some tennis shoes.

Fifteen minutes later, the difference in this boy was amazing. His dirty, sullen face was replaced with a bright, smiling one. His slacking posture was now more upright. The clean clothes and some soap and water washed away a bit of the depressing street life and shame that he is so accustomed to wearing. He and Kaleb played basketball in the front of the house, just like regular boys. No black. No white. No rich. No poor. Just kids smiling and having fun.

We decided to go out for a chicken dinner together. The restaurant we chose is a prime target for begging in Maputo, and chances are very good that our young Alfredo has been shooed away many times by the same staff that would now be serving him dinner. You should have seen this kid. He sat at the end of the table with wide eyes and watched closely what our kids did. He tentatively ordered a grape Fanta and chicken with French fries. He tried hard to use his fork and knife to eat, then gave in to the peer pressure and used his hands like everyone else. The kids all took turns writing their names and playing tic-tac-toe on scrap paper.

On our way to the restaurant, as we were sitting at a stop-light, an elderly woman came to our car window begging for money. Young Alfredo reached into his pocket and pulled out one of his coins that we had given him earlier. Reaching his hand out, he said, “Here, I have one. Let’s give it to her.” Can you even stand it?

Sarah and her family were touched by their encounter with this young boy who could easily have remained anonymous and quickly forgotten. Instead, they have a new friend to watch for as they drive down the streets, and to pray for with their children as they put them to bed.

The seed of an idea is germinating in their minds about starting a Saturday morning ministry for the abandoned and orphaned children of Maputo, taking them out of the city to land where they can run and play, where they would prepare food for them and let them shower and get clean clothes, and where they could be reassured that they are loved beyond measure.

Others have already made reality out of similar dreams. Mozambique has several homes for these malnourished, forgotten orphans. Not enough, perhaps, but homes nonetheless.

Our friend from Canada, Julie Collins, came to Mozambique for a couple of weeks in March to spend time loving some of these fortunate few who live in an orphanage in Zimpeto, just outside of Maputo. Julie loves to share story after story about the children that she has met. She talks about their bracelets and other handicrafts, their toy cars with aluminum can wheels, and their car tire acrobatics. She tells stories of proud children who relish hearing their names spoken to them, many of them knowing their name as the only possession that is uniquely theirs.

Each of these children was, at one time, like Alfredo. And one day, Alfredo may be like one of these orphans who have found a home.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

That's beautiful: both the story and the idea.

Steve, maybe the comments of this blog aren't the place for this, but I just went back and read several months' worth of entries, and I'd be interested in learning more about what you believe should be the roles of social safety nets vs. economic empowerment in helping the poor, both in Africa and in North America. What role do you think the concept of justice should play in how we regard the respective situations of the "developed" world and Africa, and how should we put that into practice. (I'm reminded of a phrase Bono uses in discussing Africa: that improving matters there is a matter not of charity, but of justice. He's not simply into handouts, though; much of his activism has been specifically related to fighting AIDS and to improving the opportunities for Africa to participate in the global economic market.)

How do you think AIDS in Mozambique affects people's ability to benefit from things like the social lending scheme you're trying to implement (which, by the way, sounds to me like a wonderful idea that would manage to economically benefit everyone while strengthening community ties)? Do you think that people sometimes need to be brought out of extreme poverty and ill health by charity (e.g. given antiretroviral drugs and the steady diet necessary to benefit from them) so that they are able to be economically productive and help themselves?

I'm really interested in your thoughts on this stuff. Your blog is fascinating and a real eye-opener.

Anonymous said...

Steve,
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your blogs. After this post I had to pick myself up off the floor and wipe the tears.
Has anyone suggested that you write a book based on your blogs?
You've already categorized your topics into chapters, and given your talent for writing you could easily tie the stories of your blogs together.
The stories are eye-openers and inspirational account of the human spirit and god's work in Africa. I'd buy the book!
Proceeds could further keep your program going.
Just a thought...
Christine Henson

Anonymous said...

Hey Steve!

Thanks for your latest comment on my blog.

In response to your question:

When I lived in Mozambique, I was quite indoctrinated... everyone told me that voting republican was the "Christian thing to do"... mainly because of the abortion issue. When I returned to the USA and began evaluating the underlying philosophies of the two parties, I became disillusioned.

How would Christ vote? On what ticket would He run? Would He be elected?

Like you suggested, I'm taking the issues one by one... Hoping to be like Christ. :)

Steve said...

Hi Christy,

These are questions that many people, including myself, struggle with. I don't want to simplify things into "left-wing" and "right-wing" political views, but I certainly have a sense that sometimes people with "left-wing" political views think that they have a monopoly on compassion, not realizing that their methods can be harmful, even if they are supposed to be helpful. That's certainly evident here -- giving people things for free makes them dependent and needy, rather than freeing them from the bondage of poverty.

That shouldn't be an excuse for "right-wing" thinkers to create programs that only help themselves. I think there's a lot of room for well-thought-out economic-based proposals that are designed to help people lift themselves out of poverty. Mindlessly raising the minimum wage and welfare benefits to subjective levels is not the most helpful intervention. In my view, poverty has very little -- something, yes, but very little -- to do with money.

There's a great book that you should read if you haven't already -- Jeffrey Sachs' "The End of Poverty." I have it and can lend it to you when we return, but it's good enough that you might want to buy it yourself. Even if you haven't read the book, you've probably heard of Jeffrey Sachs -- an economist from Columbia University in New York who works with people like Bono and the UN on global poverty issues (I think Bono is heavily influenced by Jeffrey Sachs' writings). He writes a compelling argument about a "poverty trap" -- essentially that people need to be helped onto the first rung of the development ladder by doing exactly the sorts of things that you've mentioned -- antiretrovirals, mosquito nets, etc.

Personally, I think that his views are taken sharply from the fields of economics and public health, and could benefit from a bit more psychological rigor since I think poverty is a function of mindset more than possessions, but his fundamental ideas seem right-on.

AIDS has a tremendous impact on every one and every project here. Not only does 1 in 5 people suffer from the disease, but nearly everyone has a family member who does. Nearly everyone needs to take days away from productive economic activity or education to look after sick relatives. The impact is enormous. These social lending circles can help in a couple of different ways -- first, they build community, so neighbours can help one another through difficult times. Second, they allow people access to tiny amounts of money so that they can afford medicines or develop economic opportunities. Third, the very process of bringing people together provides a forum for doing AIDS education workshops, which is what the group that we modeled our program after was doing. Of course, nothing is perfect. Microcredit is far from perfect, and so is our social lending scheme. The latter will have difficulty meeting business expansion needs, when people need more capital than their neighbours can provide.

I'm glad you're thinking about these ideas! Keep it up,

Steve.

Anonymous said...

Thank you. I think much of that makes a lot of sense.

I really need to read that Jeffrey Sachs book. I've heard of both him and the book, and of his association with Bono, before. The idea of giving poor people the basics that they need in order to be able to help themselves, but then helping them help themselves rather than giving them handouts, makes sense to me.

I'm a little skeptical of your assertion that poverty is mostly a matter of mindset rather than possessions/money. Whether one *feels* poor is certainly a matter of mindset, and of the standard of living one is used to, but whether a person's physical needs are met is fairly objective. Even if a person does not feel poor because they are no worse off than the rest of their community and they have enough money to buy grain, there is still a problem if they cannot afford medical care for a child who gets sick. There are various levels of physical needs, though -- things that are requirements for life, things that are required for basic health and comfort, and things that are required for optimal health, economic advancement, and/or full participation in society. The amount of wealth that people subjectively feel is "enough" varies very, very widely, though. (An African thinks, "I have everything I really need, but I'd like to put a roof on my house." I think, "I have everything I really need, but I'd like an apartment with more than one tiny window and no ants." A wealthier North American thinks, "I have everything I really need, but I'd like a house with a three-car garage.")

I think every society should seek to give its poor what they need to become productive participants in the economy, whatever that means at the given society's level of wealth. In Africa, that means anti-retrovirals and mosquito nets. In Toronto, that means easily available adult education and ESL training for all, high enough welfare rates that recipients can have homes and buy TTC tokens and clothes at the Sally Ann for job interviews, and child care and drug benefits available to low-income workers. In every society, it means help for the poor should heavily emphasize helping them get what they need to get and keep a job that pays a living wage -- the drugs they need to be healthy, the education they need to get a job, the child care they need for their kids to be safe while they work. It should also remove barriers to economic involvement, such as government drug benefits ceasing when someone gets a job in Ontario, or trade arrangements making it hard for Africans to sell locally produced wares abroad. If a person is genuinely unable to work (e.g. they are seriously disabled), they should have enough to live on, and but working should always be better.

I agree with you completely about the importance of empowering people to help themselves, though I think you're perhaps a bit more hard-nosed than I am :P. (Maybe that's not always a bad thing, though. I know I don't have the experience you do.) People definitely gain far more dignity when they're a part of helping themselves than when they aren't.

I appreciate your insight, and again, I think the social lending circles are a great idea!